Parents should be held responsible for their childrens

It is the responsibility of parents to teach their children proper behaviour so they should be somewhat responsible for the behaviour of their children of course there are many factors that go into this including the age of the child and the intentions of the child. But parents should not be held liable for behavior that occurs outside of their sight, without their knowledge or permission, by their children that's taking the blame game further than it should go. Parents should be held morally and legally responsible for the actions of their children because parents are the only one can make their child change to be a good person other than their selves parents should be held morally and legally responsible for the actions of theor children should parents be. So, it is widely debated at global level with some people reckon parents should legally held responsible for their children while others oppose it and stand on different side with the different views. To conclude, the statement “parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s activities” is very right children notice every action their parents do and hence do the same in my opinion, parents should give more time to their children and focus on their every activity.

Background and context at the outset it must be noted that parental responsibility means different things in different contexts in the united states and parts of canada parental responsibility will often refer to a kind of law that hold parents legally accountable for the actions of their children. So i believe parents should not be held accountable for their children’s actions because blaming parents is not going to help children learn from their mistakes advocates who subscribe to full parental accountability stated, “they believe parents should know about and control their children’s actions and accept their obligation to bear. Parents’ responsibility for their children’s actions by janet portman, attorney in certain situations, parents will be held responsible for the actions of their children and sometimes, criminal sanctions will follow as well.

But sometimes kids do things even though their parents have told them not to i think it will be hard for the district to prove in court that the parents are at fault for the bullying if it decides to sue. Mark o'mara says parents who don't monitor their kids' social media use should be held responsible for the consequences. Parents can also be held criminally liable if they know or should have known their child possessed a firearm and failed to take the firearm from the child criminal penalties typically range from a misdemeanor conviction for allowing access to a firearm or a felony conviction if the firearm injures or kills a person. -parents are held responsible for teaching their children right from wrong,and if they fail to do so then yes they should be held responsible for their children actions, to a certain extent -laws holding parents liable for their children's actions aren't new.

This further emphasizes the fact that a parent should be legally responsible for a child’s actions how a child behaves in society is a direct result of what his parents have taught him when a child does well at his school, for instance, society lauds his parents for their impeccable parenting. Most states will hold parents liable for their kids in civil court and criminalize the act of contributing to the delinquency of a minor, with which parents can be charged criminal charges for. “parents should be held solely responsible for their children’s actions” do you agree a webquest for secondary 3 na / 3 exp / 4 na designed by.

But if parents fail to fulfil this duty, then they should be held responsible for their children’s activities in the american legal system, many parents are punished for their child’s behaviour parents are aware of the positive and negative side of a child. Should parents pay if their children end up in trouble with the law many crimes and social problems are caused by children despite the damage these teenage criminals cause, parents are not held responsible in most countries. The issue of access to guns by minors and the question of whether parents or guardians should be held legally responsible took on added urgency this month when 16-year-old bryan oliver obtained.

Parents should be held responsible for their childrens

parents should be held responsible for their childrens The child gets the message that he’s not responsible for his own behavior and choices—his parents are unfortunately, this can lead to a lifetime pattern of blaming others and refusing to take responsibility.

Parents bear many responsibilities, among them providing for their child’s basic needs, ensuring the child is educated, and protecting the child from harm in addition, parents are responsible for instilling moral values and social norms. In those states, parents may be held responsible for negligent or intentional acts as well as for crimes of their children generally, parents may be responsible for the behavior of their minor children—the definition of which also varies by state—although liability usually does not attach until the child is between the ages of eight and 10. Tibo822 hi yes i think that the parents of a sixteen year old should be held accountable for their kids actions and'those of a twenty year old, if living under same roof also though i feel that those same parents also need to extend some sort of consequences for the vandalizing their kid did. No the children should be held responsible because its is the toughts and their body which is involved in these bad actions the parents should be as responsilble because children change through out life and parents cant always control what their children do.

  • If parents are given the freedom to correct their children in the way they think best, then they should be held responsible for their children’s actions they would also have to undergo punishment if the children are too young to bear the consequences of their actions.
  • Minor children should not be held legally accountable for their actions, nor should they be obligated to provide for themselves until they have reached the age of majority governments have established laws drawing distinctions between adults and juveniles for a reason.
  • I do not think that the parent should be held responsible for what their kids do the reason that i say that is because, some parents are very good and teach their kids at home and the kids decide not to listen to them and do their own thing.

A parent should not be responsible for there childs actions after a sertain age the child a human and has a mind of thier own they think on there own and they know right from wrong a parent should not have to pay for a childs crimes if they do it would be a never ending cycle with life a child would never learn their leason it would. Although there is a special relationship between parents and their children, legal experts say, the courts have not said parents should be held criminally responsible for their children's acts. Parents are their children’s first mentor, role model or teacher so in my view, should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts under the law, parents are entitled to monitor and educate their children on what is right and wrong, individually or socially.

parents should be held responsible for their childrens The child gets the message that he’s not responsible for his own behavior and choices—his parents are unfortunately, this can lead to a lifetime pattern of blaming others and refusing to take responsibility. parents should be held responsible for their childrens The child gets the message that he’s not responsible for his own behavior and choices—his parents are unfortunately, this can lead to a lifetime pattern of blaming others and refusing to take responsibility.
Parents should be held responsible for their childrens
Rated 5/5 based on 20 review

2018.